Showing posts with label best practice. Show all posts
Showing posts with label best practice. Show all posts

Friday, March 25, 2011

Feedback Culture?

Before engaging in a feedback process like 360 degree feedback, it is important to know whether your organization is ready to engage in this kind of activity. Do you have a feedback culture? Are you prepared to foster one?

Maybe you've been looking and asking around. Maybe you've heard your competitors use feedback tools to improve performance and development. Yet, if you're thinking of engaging in a feedback process like 360 degree feedback just because your competitors use it, think twice. Organizations may choose to do a 360 degree feedback just because their competitors do. Or maybe to give the impression of openness and participation to employees, clients or recruits when, in fact, this is not a part of the organization's culture. Regardless, this amounts to using a tool or procedure for political purposes and is ultimately counter-productive.

If, on the other hand, your organization has a growing commitment to openness and feedback, then perhaps it's time. Just be sure you're going in for the right reasons.

Friday, July 31, 2009

Beyond the Cookie Cutter Approach: Customizing your Company’s Incentive Program

Bookmark and Share
August Benefits Installment by Jim Moniz

* * *

Vision, potential, communication and motivation – are the key elements to an effective company’s incentive program. But in the absence of well-defined indicators and a “best practices” framework, even the most comprehensive program can fall short.

The foundation of an incentive program is basic; it must project the potential that can be realized by the company if its purpose if fulfilled. It must also identify employees who are in a position to impact those outcomes. Moreover, it should standardize its benefits/rewards and determine how much of an increased shareholder value will be allocated to employees and how its value will be measured.

Indicators, sometimes referred to as measures and metrics in a company’s reward strategies, are pivotal to a well-oiled incentive program.

The role of indicators is straightforward – they should seek to improve performance, influence behavior and create focus. This is accomplished through communication and reinforcement to encourage a company wide culture of employee ownership mentality.

Indicators should not be confused with motivators. Motivation is an internal element, something that is encouraged by aligning employees with roles and tasks that are consistent with their abilities. This will encourage them to shine. Motivation is additionally stimulated by a mutual vision between the company and employees.

That said, if indicators are not properly nor thoroughly defined, employee motivation can collapse under an incentive program – this can happen when workforce members see a disconnection between their role in the company and how rewards are earned. This is why a “best practices” framework – a Profit Based Allocation – is a vital component to a company’s incentive program.

A “best practices” framework should address a number of issues, including how company growth is defined; the baseline upon which contributions to the profit pool will be based; payment threshold; percentage to be shared; an allocation formula; and a definition of the expected individual’s performance.

There is nothing “cookie cutter” about an effective incentive program– what may work for one company could be way off the mark for another. The most expedient way to achieve the ideal program for your company is to be fully aware of best practice standards and frameworks, and then work within that structure to customize indicators and measures specific to your organization.

Incentive programs that work best are based on a company’s culture, business model and goals. Communication and reinforcement of results on an ongoing basis is critical. A C- incentive program will outperform an A+ program without ongoing communication and reinforcement. Companies should match their incentive program to those crucial components and then stay the course.

* * *

About our Benefits Installment Author:

James E. (Jim) Moniz, CEO of Northeast VisionLink, a Massachusetts firm that specializes in structuring executive compensation. James E. Moniz is a national speaker on the topic of wealth management and on executive compensation.

Monday, April 20, 2009

Confronting the Problem

Bookmark and Share
By HR-Worldview Regular Columnist: George Krafcisin

* * *

At one time in my career, I inherited supervision of a group of consultants. I was happy to manage the crew, who were for the most part seasoned veterans who knew their jobs better than I did. Except for “Jane.” She had been in the same job for over twenty years, and I could see from the reports of her consultations with clients that she was still doing the job the way it had been done when she started. My budget for red ink went up as I rewrote her reports before our clients could see them. On the other hand, she was a dependable worker, very pleasant, and clients liked her. Heck, I liked her. But she clearly couldn’t handle the changes in the profession, and she was a drag on our success.

Her prior supervisor - my boss - had always given her a pass on appraisals, so the safe thing would be to ignore the issue. Her performance review date was coming up soon, so I had to fly out to her office on the East Coast and do something. So was I going to be the hard-hearted axe-man and just fire her? What would that do for my reputation with the rest of the staff? I could just spend some extra time rewriting her reports. Was that fair to the rest of the staff, and to me? Maybe I could offer her extra training and hope that she could turn around twenty years of underperformance. I knew that wasn’t going to work. So what to do?

I didn’t really have a plan, other than to lay out what I thought was wrong with her work, and see what happened. With my usual good sense of timing, I flew out two days before Thanksgiving for the confrontation. I got out the report drafts from the last few months, went through all of my notes highlighting the problems. Jane didn’t say a word. When I was done, I asked, “OK, so where do we go from here? Do I just keep giving you grief until you retire?”

In retrospect, I can see what I had done right - and wrong. On the good side, I had decided to do something, rather than ignore the situation. It wasn’t fair to Jane, to me, or to the company to tolerate performance that just wasn’t acceptable. I had also set up a good, objective set of criteria that defined “good performance”, and had documentation of the shortcomings, so there were no arguments about that.

On the bad side, I had caved on deciding what I really wanted to happen. I hoped for a good outcome, but I hadn’t really decided what I would do if nothing changed. Also, I had implied that I would like Jane to retire and that would have gotten me in hot water if she decided to make an issue of it. And I hadn’t separated myself from my emotional need to be nice to a nice person. So I had crossed my fingers and hoped for the best. And I had no idea what Jane thought - I’d given her no feedback on what her review might contain, just copies of rewritten reports.

Jane’s response? She said, “I’ve been thinking about this situation for some time. I’m tired of doing this same old job. I’ve met someone special, and we’re thinking of getting married. I would like to work a few more months, and then retire. Would that fit in with your plans?”

Which leads me to a checklist for dealing with those conversations you wish you didn’t have to have:
  1. Decide in advance what you want to happen with the “problem”. What outcome do you want to see? Shoot for a “win-win” if you can.
  2. Do your homework and define the facts - not your feelings. What is the problem? Can you document it so there’s no argument about it?
  3. What are your feelings? You need to know what they are to understand how they are influencing your actions.
  4. What is the other person’s view? Do you know? How can you find out? How might that change the situation?
  5. Lay out the problem in objective terms and avoid criticizing personal traits. Say, “Your reports don’t meet standards,” rather than “You can’t write good reports.”
  6. Get a clear agreement from the other person as to what will happen by when. And follow up on it.
As for Jane? Happily married and retired. She asked if I wanted to join her and her fiance for dinner next time I was in town.

About Our Columnist:

George Krafcisin is the President, coach and trainer of Mosaic Management, Inc. He writes regular installments on the topics of leadership and management here on HR-Worldview.

Monday, February 23, 2009

How do you conduct 360 Feedback Follow-up? (Part 1 of 2)

A big question that companies need to ask themselves after "completing" a 360 Degree Feedback project is "what should we do with the results?". Far too often what ends up happening is that each employee gets a copy of a virtually illegible 30 or 40 page report and is told to look it over. Of course, that report finds itself in the waste bin while its clone is filed away to be compared with the report generated by the next 360.


A process like this leaves employees feeling like the 360 Degree Feedback project was A) just a formality and B) a waste of time. Either no emphasis is put on improvement or (if on the off chance that desire for improvement IS communicated at all) no methods, approaches, goals, etc are laid down upon which the employee is to improve. 

"It's just something that we do once a year."

This is a waste of time and a waste of money and if this is the way your company is conducting 360 Degree feedback or multi-rater feedback projects, you might as well stop doing them all together.

Does the above sound familiar to you?

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

Customized Knowledge Solutions

Bookmark and Share
It takes a long time for a method, application or technique to become "Best Practice". It has to circulate through the journals, get "workshopped" in the business schools, get implemented in the fortune 500's and then make its way to the trade shows in the form of keynote addresses and on and on until it reaches your desk. 

But what if you had a hint as to what the future "Best Practices" will be? What if you could listen in at the point between "the journals" and "the workshops"? Well, if you knew the right journals to check and you read through them, then you would be off to a good start. Or, maybe you have Lexis-Nexis business; that's a good start, too. But you also need the time to do this.

We now offer Customized Knowledge Solutions.

We hunt down the next "Best Practices" for you. We search ALL the relevant databases (not just Lexis-Nexis), we read and digest all the relevant journals, we have the time.

We have started to collect and structure knowledge on request. 





Here's how it works:

1) You give us a topic such as:
  • Leadership Learning
  • Leadership Training
  • Employee Assessments
  • Organizational Commitment
  • Talent Management
  • Employee Relations
  • Employee Confidence
  • Executive Talent
  • Innovative Talent
  • Leader Member Exchange
  • Performance Management
  • Organizational Engagement
  • Work Group Integration
  • Whatever you want…
2) We RESEARCH that topic in depth, picking through databases like:
  • Academic Search Premiere
  • Lexis-Nexis Business
  • Lexis-Nexis Academic
  • JStore
  • PubMed
  • PsycINFO
  • PsycPUB
  • Web of Science
  • WorldCat
  • ProQuest
4) These databases search through thousands of relevant journals such as:
  • Educational Management Administration & Leadership
  • Journal of Information Science
  • Social Studies
  • Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
  • Theory into Practice
  • Economist
  • Social Indicators Research
  • Leader to Leader
  • Journal of Psychology
  • Behavior Modification
  • Expert Systems with Applications
  • Workforce Management
  • Journal of Applied Psychology
  • Behavior Modification
  • Expert Systems with Applications
  • Workforce Management
  • Gender, Work & Organization
  • T + D
  • And thousands more...
4) We read and digest the most relevant journal articles from the most relevant journals and prepare for you the following:
  • The Abstracts from several relevant articles
  • A comprehensive digest of article "take aways"
  • Information on how to obtain the full articles
  • Information on the availability of managerial techniques relevant to the article topics
  • Information on how to implement existing or non-existing techniques, tools, etc on the basis of this new knowledge.
  • Insight into the future "Best Practices"

For more information on Customized Knowledge Solutions, or to perform a trial "search", please send us an e-mail to "info@hr-meter.com"